 |
August
02, 2004 The Times
Eureka! Thinking outside the bath ...
By Anjana Ahuja
You'd
think anyone would spot a gorilla cavorting on a basketball court
- but you'd be wrong. And this inability to see the obvious can
prevent us from thinking more creatively
THE SCENE of my humiliation was a pub in Hackney. As I sipped wine
and chatted to my brother-in-law, I failed to see the cars with
blue flashing lights pull up outside. I became temporarily deaf
to the ear-splitting sirens. I somehow missed the snake of police
officers who stormed the pub to drag away, from the other side of
the bar, a tribe of wedding guests who had greeted each other with
flying fists and diving foreheads. Most disappointing of all, I
failed to observe the sobbing bride, fleeing the pub in a dishevelled,
tear-stained meringue.
To
this day I remain stupefied by how I, reputedly possessed of professional
observational skills, could miss a police raid unfolding in the
same room (all credit to Harry for the riveting gossip, I suppose).
But Richard Wiseman, a professor of psychology at Hertfordshire
University and professional magician, isn’t surprised at all.
We are all guilty of missing the obvious, of failing to see the
bigger picture because we are focusing on narrower tasks in hand.
While
my lapse was an observational one, Wiseman believes the real problem
in business is that no one is brave enough to step back from their
day-to-day responsibilities and let their minds roam free. If they
did, he says, they might spot a “gorilla”, a killer
idea that can transform company fortunes and even change history.
A
gorilla, Wiseman explains in his book Did
You Spot the Gorilla?, is a why-didn’t-anyone-think-of-that-before
insight, a flash of brilliance that seems obvious once unleashed.
Examples include Ikea— the idea of funky, cheap selfassembly
furniture — and Post-it Notes, which stickered their way into
ubiquity after an enterprising employee realised that the weak adhesive
he had unintentionally developed might have a use after all. Other
recent gorillas include the Anywayup Cup, a non-spill beaker for
toddlers, and easyJet, the no-frills airline that has utterly changed
the way we think about air travel. Wiseman labels their inventors
Eureka thinkers (the Greek mathematician Archimedes was supposed
to have shrieked “Eureka!” — “I have found
it” - in his bath, when he realised that the volume of an
object could be gauged by the amount of water it displaced).
“Why
didn’t someone think of Ikea 20 years before the man who did
think of it?” asks Wiseman. “It’s so obvious.
He saw that there were a lot of people who couldn’t spend
a fortune on furniture but still wanted nice well-designed, stuff.
Until then, you had to go somewhere such as MFI, which wasn’t
exactly known for its style. It’s a great example of a gorilla.
And now he’s one of the richest guys in the world.”
Wiseman
appropriated the primate in an allusion to a study carried out in
1999 by Daniel Simons at Harvard University. Volunteers watched
a 30-second film of people playing basketball. Three players wore
white T-shirts, three wore black ones. Viewers were told to count
the number of passes made by one team. Afterwards they were asked
for the tally, and whether they had seen anything unusual. Astonishingly,
only a very few put their hands up; these individuals had seen something
that should have been blindingly obvious to everyone: halfway into
the film, a man dressed as a gorilla walked on court and beat his
chest at the camera. Everyone else was so fixated on trying to count
the passes that they completely missed this surreal moment.
Wiseman,
38, calls it a “perfect demonstration of an unbelievable psychological
blind spot”. He has repeated the experiment numerous times,
with the same result. “I’ve shown the film on normal
TVs and also on massive projector screens, and most people still
don’t see the gorilla,” he says.
Interestingly, by tweaking the set-up, he can coax an entire audience
into missing the gorilla. “If I introduce a competitive edge,
such as pitting men against women, I can get the number of people
who see the gorilla down to 5 per cent.” It shows that, under
pressure, we are even more likely to miss what is under our noses.
Worryingly,
when Wiseman tried the experiment on the country’s top scientists
at the Royal Society, not one spotted the hairy interloper. They,
and Wiseman, could hardly believe it: “It’s amazing,
isn’t it? In some ways it’s actually worse if nobody
spots the gorilla, because you get accused of switching films. But
on the other hand, scientists are extremely good at focusing.”
Afterwards, Wiseman says, one well-known scientist thanked him for
opening his eyes to the gorillas that he and his students might
be missing in the laboratory.
Becoming
a Eureka thinker often entails shedding our overwhelming desire
to conform. For example, given a square sandpit with buried treasure
and a shovel, where would you start digging? For me, it’s
the bottom right-hand corner. Bad move, says Wiseman. Nearly everyone
chooses the middle or a corner, or somewhere along a diagonal. That’s
fine if that’s where the loot is buried and you get there
first. But if the loot is somewhere else, it is the soul brave enough
to dig in the undisturbed patch that ends up the richer. Similarly,
when people are asked to pick a number between 1 and 10, most choose
5 or 7 (yep, I fell for that one, too). Asked to choose one between
1 and 50 that contains two prime digits (eg, 17) most choose 35
and 37 (I have to admit to Wiseman that I chose 37).
“It’s
amazing that we all tend to think alike,” muses Wiseman. “It
could mean that we’re all missing something. In fact, groups
of people are no better because they share responsibility and often
see things the same way.” In particular, companies are often
built on conformity, which squeezes out original thinkers. Businesspeople
— and scientists — tend to be good at sitting exams,
which requires adherence to the notion of right and wrong answers.
Businesses can haul themselves out of creative ruts by throwing
different people into the mix. So advertisers planning ideas meetings
should invite Janice from accounts and Derek, the security guard,
for their fresh perspectives (provided Janice and Derek aren’t
silenced with fear at the prospect). And don’t expect people
to have sharp ideas at exactly 3.30pm, or whenever your meeting
is scheduled.
“I recently gave a talk on creative thinking to a company,
and it sent me an agenda,” says Wiseman. “It amused
me somewhat. That’s not how creative thinking works. You’re
unlikely to come up with killer solutions on schedule.” That’s
why he follows his own advice: if he gets stuck on something, he
leaves it and comes back to it later. Sleeping on a problem is another
good ruse — while dreaming, he says, disparate ideas come
together in unexpected juxtapositions, and these weird links can
generate novel ideas.
He
is in great demand as a business speaker, mostly, he suspects, because
his work legitimises the idea of taking risks. “It’s
almost as if managers need permission to do this kind of stuff.
It’s about saying it’s OK to take your time, not rush
into solutions. It’s OK to ask people to do things that don’t
seem particularly productive. Companies under pressure often go
with the first solution they come up with, but who’s to say
it’s the best?” It is not uncommon for innovation-based
companies to allow employees to do their own thing for, say, 10
per cent of their time.
Wiseman
suggests banning e-mail within offices as it has replaced the personal
exchanges that can throw up unexpected leads. His tips for successful
meetings include choosing four words at random and discussing them
for a while, bringing personal experiences to bear (hint: have a
life outside the office), coming up with more than one solution
to a problem, and doing the opposite of what is done normally. He
suggests, for example, that the next Times features meeting should
involve everyone thinking up articles that will interest absolutely
nobody. From such perverse deliberations, an absolute corker may
pop out. Well, we can live in hope.
His book can be read in under an hour — it is lighthearted
and full of quizzes to elicit a reader’s Eureka potential,
along with tips for improvement. He wrote it as an antidote to the
doorstoppers clogging up business bookshelves. “I fly to Edinburgh
a lot, and wanted something I could read on a 55-minute flight.
You get so many dull, 2in-thick books on creativity. Instead of
putting people in the right frame of mind, they make you think of
exams. I wanted to write something people would enjoy.”
At
£6.99 a pop, it’s not a bad Eureka idea itself. In fact,
Wiseman, who also wrote a bestseller on how to be luckier, is full
of them. He’s thought up a fantastic wheeze for booklovers:
since buying books for people is so difficult, and book tokens are
such a cop-out, why not sell tomes containing the first chapters
of 15 books with a token tucked away in the back? Bibliophiles are
bound to want to buy more than one, he says, so the bookshop makes
more money.
The point is that nobody got anywhere new by taking the road most
travelled. A year ago he subjected volunteers to a stress test that
involved packing them off to Oxford Street with a shopping list
of items they had to procure, such as a certain brand of trainer.
The person who came back with the most change from £40 was
the winner: “The idea was that this would put people under
stress. But one bloke took the £40, went to a casino and put
it all on red. He got back £80, went to the first shop, bought
what was required and came back. He had a completely different take
on things. He’d be the guy I’d want working for me;
I wouldn’t care if he lost £40 several times over if
he pulled off a stunt like that once in a while
Return to main
luck page |